FANDOM

CrinosWolf500

Blocked
  • My occupation is fucking around
  • I am wasting my time on the internet coz I've got fuck all to do

This is a User talk page. See Saints Row Wiki:Discussions for discussion policies.


WelcomeEdit

Thanks for your contributions. We hope you'll stick around and become a regular editor here.

There is plenty to do and there are many ways you can improve the wiki.
New information is always welcome in any article, but here are some specifics if you need ideas:

Or check out these general pages:


BlockEdit

You are blocked for 1 week for making changes to an article while there was an existing discussion regarding those changes. Normally, it wouldn't be a week block, but you clearly communicated that you were aware of the discussion in your edit summary to this edit, which reads: "Check my response on the talk page." The top of each talk page includes the sentence: "If there is an existing discussion about proposed changes, please contribute to that discussion." -452 20:33, June 30, 2018 (UTC)

I don't mean to argue in my defence, but I was simply alerting you about my response. Is that any reason to block me? And I figured it would've been okay for me to undo considering I had already explained my reasonable and justifiable actions. Being that I am not entirely familiar with the rules of this wikia, I'll leave it up to you whether you wish to unblock me or not. Thanks. User:CrinosWolf500 (Chat me up) 20:43, June 30, 2018 (UTC)
That's not what leaving "see talk page" in edit summary is for, that was to tell you, the first time, that I was starting a discussion. Being alerted to responses is what the "follow" function is for.
In real life, if you're in the middle of a discussion with someone about, say, "which drawer the scissors belong in", would you move the scissors between the 2 drawers each time one of you spoke?
That's a rhetorical question, the answer is: No, that would be absurd. -452 20:57, June 30, 2018 (UTC)
Well I am sorry for coming to that conclusion. Typically people on other wikia's only get that kind of attention when they see something like that in an edit summary, directing them to there, not many people use the follow function you see so I assumed you didn't as well. I will admit that I was in the wrong for using that kind of judgement, but in all fairness you can't really blame me for thinking that way when it happens often on many wikias out there. Also FYI, it wouldn't be "absurd" to unblock me over a little misconduct, it would just be something for me to think about for future reference whenever I'm further editing on here, everyone makes mistakes, including the staff. User:CrinosWolf500 (Chat me up) 21:15, June 30, 2018 (UTC)
Being that I am blocked, and you just proclaimed that you are not blocking me due to my mistake. I will be posting my response to what you said on the Player Custimization talk page here, you may delete it and move it there to make it look official if you wish. Starts here:
(Off-topic comments removed by admin)
User:CrinosWolf500 (Chat me up) 21:15, June 30, 2018 (UTC)
"you just proclaimed that you are not blocking me due to my mistake. I will be posting my response..."
What? -452 22:49, June 30, 2018 (UTC)
On second thought, no. It's very clear I have never "proclaimed that I am not blocking you".
You don't get to attempt to explain that lie. You are now blocked from editing this page for claiming I said something I clearly never said. (As covered by Saints Row Wiki:Civility)
And I have now removed your off-topic comments from this page. Comments continuing the discussion on Talk:Player Customization do not belong here. By choosing to revert the page edit, you chose to be blocked and lose the ability to take part in the discussion.
-452 22:56, June 30, 2018 (UTC)
And now it's a one year block for contacting me on another wiki regarding this block.
Blocking your access to edit this page does not mean "please contact me on another wiki if you want to continue discussing this". -452 01:23, July 1, 2018 (UTC)
You have again left a message on another wiki, so your block has been extended.
Blocking your access to edit this page, removing the message you left me on another wiki, and extending your block to 1 year because of said message does not mean "please contact me again on another wiki if you want to continue discussing this".
So far, I've just been removing your messages without reading them, but I will be reporting you for harassment if you contact me again.
-452 04:41, July 1, 2018 (UTC)
Everything you've done follows the same through-line of questionable behaviour:
  • Thinking you're allowed to change valid wording of an article because of your opinion.
  • Thinking you're allowed to revert my undo simply because you replied to the talk page discussion.
  • Thinking you're allowed to continue the talk page discussion on your user talk page after being blocked.
  • Thinking you're allowed to discuss your block on a different wiki after your block was changed to disallow editing your talk page.
If you had simply replied to the Talk:Player Customization without reverting my undo, you wouldn't be blocked.
-452 05:04, July 1, 2018 (UTC)

Alternate accountsEdit

It has been brought to my attention that this user has a long history of vandalism, abusing multiple accounts, and harassing administrators.

Not only has this user formerly edited here under another username, but they had been previously blocked on a different wiki for edit warring, so they were perfectly well aware that reverting an edit under discussion was unacceptable.

All of the previous alternate accounts are now globally blocked.

Given the history of repeated poor behaviour across multiple wikis involving harassment and multiple accounts, I doubt this is every account they have used. I also suspect they are behind several other globally blocked troll accounts, as well as proxy-using anons.

-452 23:14, January 22, 2020 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.